National Pig Association - The voice of the British pig industry

PigWorld Logo

Home > News > Antibiotic figures highlight post-Brexit trade risks
HealthWelfare

Antibiotic figures highlight post-Brexit trade risks

8th Feb 2018 / By Alistair Driver

The use of antibiotics in US pig farming is twice as high as in the UK, according to the Alliance to Save our Antibiotics.

pig farmAn investigation by the campaign group suggests overall use of antibiotics in US farming is five times higher than in UK production. This includes double the volume per livestock unit for pigs, while use in the US is nine to 16 times higher for beef cattle, three times higher for chickens, and five times higher for turkeys than it is in the UK.

The Alliance say the figures highlight the need for the UK Government to consider antibiotic usage in food production when negotiating a post-Brexit trade deal with the US.

The figures, based on recently published data from the UK and the US, are due to be discussed at a conference at the Royal Society of Medicine in London today entitled 'Antimicrobial resistance and agriculture: Is there a threat to public health and how is British farming responding?’

A recent report by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) has estimated global farm antibiotic use by continent and found use by animal weight about 20% lower in Africa than in Europe. However, in the Americas it was about 80% higher than in Europe, and in Asia Pacific about 190% higher than in Europe, although only five countries reported data from Asia Pacific.

Speaking at the Oxford Farming Conference (OFC) in January, Ted McKinney, US Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs USDA, said he was 'sick and tired' of hearing Britain’s concerns about chlorine washed chicken and US food standards.

“We would hold our food safety and environmental and animal welfare standards up against the UK any day of the week and twice on Sunday,” he said.

The ASOA's Suzi Shingler said: “If Mr McKinney wants something to worry about other than chlorine washed chicken, he might want to turn his attention to the extraordinarily high levels of antibiotics used in US meat production.”

NPA view

NPA senior policy advisor Georgina Crayford said: "These figures highlight the points we have been raising about the need to ensure equivalence in standards when we negotiate new trade deals with the US. Antibiotic use which the UK pig industry is making great strides in reducing and refining, is one just one area where very different standards exist globally.

“Sow stalls, banned in the UK in 1999, are still a big part of US pig production, while the feed additive ractopamine is also permitted, even though it has been banned in the EU for many years.”

“Allowing imports produced to lower standards at lower costs into the UK under future trade deals would cause huge damage to our industry and do a great disservice to consumers.”

Gwyn Jones, chairman of the Responsible Use of Medicines in Agriculture (RUMA) alliance, said: “We welcome that through recording and submitting data, the US – one of the world’s biggest food producers – is actively engaging with the global One Health issue. However, direct comparisons between countries are not always helpful.

"The UK is among the leaders internationally in promoting responsible antibiotic use in farm animals, but doing so without impacting animal health and welfare – or food safety – requires a measured and specific approach. Unified action under a global One Health strategy may be the goal, but each country must identify its own priorities, approach and timescales to achieve appropriate and sustainable change.”

Campaigns