Scientists offer reassurance on discovery of LA-MRSA in pork
5th Oct 2016 / By Alistair Driver
The finding of livestock-associated MRSA in samples of pork sold in supermarkets should not be seen as a surprise or as a significant public health risk, according to experts in the field.
On Monday, the Guardian reported on tests showing three samples out of 97 UK-produced pork products sold in Asda and Sainsbury’s were contaminated with the superbug strain which it said can be resistant to ‘even the strongest antibiotics’.
The Guardian, working with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ), said it had also established that a loophole in import regulations is leaving an open door for MRSA CC398-infected live pigs from countries such as Denmark, where the disease is rife.
The story of the ‘superbug alert’ was widely picked up across the media on Tuesday, with some articles claiming families could be put at risk from the bugs found on their supermarket pork.
Scientists involved in the field have sought to reassure consumers the risks remain low.
Nicola Williams, Professor of Bacterial Zoonotic Disease at the University of Liverpool, said:
“Current data does not suggest that livestock-associated MRSA is common among UK pig herds. Even if herds are infected with significant levels of the bacteria, the extent of contamination of meat with MRSA will be much lower than compared to food-poisoning bacteria such as Salmonella, so the risk of transmission to people will be lower.”
She advised that adopting good hygiene practices in the kitchen and washing your hands when handling raw meat and cooking meat properly should minimise any risk.
She added: “It is important to remember that even if someone does become colonised with MRSA it does not mean they will necessarily develop disease or illness.
"People can carry MRSA in their nose and throat without it causing an infection; however, it does mean that by carrying the bacteria you may be more likely to develop a subsequent infection - if you undergo surgery for example, or if you are immunocompromised.”
Prof Mark Woolhouse FMedSci, Professor of Infectious Disease Epidemiology at the University of Edinburgh, said:
“Livestock acquired MRSA is a well-known, but rare, food safety risk. It has been found in food animals, in food and occasionally in people for many years. It must be taken seriously but it has shown no sign of causing a pandemic and this small study does not change that assessment.
“However, the study does indicate the value of continued surveillance and monitoring of all food-borne bacteria, especially those that are resistant to antibiotics.”
Prof Ross Fitzgerald, Chair of Molecular Bacteriology at The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, said:
“The identification of MRSA CC398 in UK supermarket samples has been reported previously and is not surprising considering the high prevalence of MRSA among pig populations in some countries in Europe.
“However, even in Denmark, food-borne transmission of MRSA to humans is very limited. There is no evidence that the presence of MRSA in pork will lead to a pandemic in human populations.”
The full NPA response can be viewed here. Key points include:
- LA-MRSA is of negligible risk to the health of the general public, with the main risk being to agricultural workers with prolonged exposure to livestock
- Defra and the National Pig Association recommend that anyone importing breeding pigs to Britain should have them screened for LA-MRSA
- The Government is currently reviewing options for increased surveillance of LA-MRSA, which will be proportionate to the very low health risk
- Presence of resistance to antibiotics in LA-MRSA cannot be directly attributed to malpractice in use of antibiotics. This is because the LA-MRSA retains the resistance genes even when the bacteria may not have been exposed to the antibiotic.
The NPA’s LA-MRSA briefing can be viewed here